Wolves are a hot button in Alaska, where “aerial predator control” (i.e. shooting wolves from airplanes) is practiced and game management is a way of life. Right now, state biologists are butting heads with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on their right to kill wolves on an Aleutian island to protect caribou calves.
This prompted me to learn more about wolves, so I’m reading Wolf Wars, by Hank Fischer, which is about the extermination of wolves in the Rockies in the late 19th century and their reintroduction in the 1980s. What is truly fascinating is the public hatred for wolves in the early 1900s. Not just among ranchers and hunters. One Colorado newspaper described the Custer wolf as “not merely a wolf, but a monstrosity of nature-half wolf, half mountain lion-possessing the cruelty of both and the craftiness of Satan himself.” (So much for objective journalism.)
Two main events in the 1880s and 1890s induced this bad rep for wolves-the near-extinction of bison and the boom of livestock. Both human-caused. Hunters slaughtered hundreds of thousands of buffalo a year for their hides (and tongues). At the same time, ranchers filled the Yellowstone region with cattle. At this point, the wolf population was still healthy because trappers wanted bison, deer, elk and beaver.
Once they had no more natural prey, they began to stalk livestock. Ranchers were so pissed, and influential, that Montana passed a bounty on wolves in 1883-$1 per wolf.
Around 1915, federal agencies jumped on board. The National Park Service began exterminating wolves (poisoning them, shooting them, crawling into their dens to destroy entire families) to protect ranchers’ stock. “Park Service rangers killed the last known den in Yellowstone Park in 1923.”
I understand why ranchers hated wolves for preying on their cattle. But how did this hatred spread to the rest of society? But to blame the wolf for disrupting natural balances? “The most obvious explanation for why people exterminated wolves still seems best. It was self-interest, plain and simple, not malice or ignorance. If a pack of wolves today killed 25 percent of a rancher’s livestock, we’d still destroy them. If wolves threatened the existence of big-game populations, we probably wouldn’t tolerate it; witness the struggles over wolf management in Alaska” (22).
It’s not that I believe wolves should rank before humans — ranchers have businesses to run and families to feed. (Sport hunters!?!? give me a break!)
But the wolf’s annihilation in the Rockies was the result of a political process. Which was the result of economics, as usual. We will always act in our best economic interests. But hopefully this doesn’t mean clearing the planet of amazing wild animals.

